Read + Write + Report
Home | Start a blog | About Orble | FAQ | Blogs | Writers | Paid | My Orble | Login
 
Picking the rare gems out of a sea of crap.... so you don't have to!

Movie Review: The Signal

July 10th 2009 06:45


Premise: A weird signal begins to broadcast over every TV, radio & phone. Those that are exposed to it have their perceptions warped, suffer hallucinations, and are convinced to kill those around them. The story is told in 3 parts (or transmissions): The first follows the story of a girl name Mya (Anessa Ramsey), who is married to controlling husband (AJ Bowen), but is sleeping with another man (Justin Welborn). The second transmission follows the husabdn, Lewis, and the third follows the lover, Ben.


The Signal should be applauded as an example of low-budget film-making. Despite the use of some pretty convincing prosthetics, the movie relies on clever fliming and non-linear plotlines to tell it's story.

What makes this movie so entertaining is it's portrayal of the signal-induced madness. This movie features alot of hallucinations: Sometimes we know what it is, other times we don't. Couple that with convincing acting from all characters, both lead and supporting, and what you are left with is a highly entertaining use of 103 minutes. One of the goriest points in the movie is when Ben brutally crushes Lewis' skull by repeatedly smashing it with the tank of a pesticide sprayer, and then we snap back to reality and realize it was just a hallucination.

Speaking of gore, there are some deliciously brutal scenes that the gorehounds will salivate over. I like to think the talking-head sequence was a homage to Reanimator, needless to say I was entertained. Possibly the most disturbing point of the movie was seeing Lewis torture a woman by spraying pesticide in her eyes, and then spraying it down her throat to kill her... so there isn't much holding back despite the low budget. The movie cleverly keeps alot of the gore off-camera and keeps the rest in quick shots, making it violently brutal and effective.


The acting, as I mentioned, is solid all-round.
They're Heeeeere
Special credit goes to AJ Bowen as Lewis, the creepy controlling husband trying to find his wife. What makes this movie so special is it's ability to confuse, and the acting is definitely a contributing factor. I also like how they have handled the insanity element: All of the people affected by the signal don't really realize it, and are logically convinced to kill people. As such, no one is really crazy, and yet everyone really is. Knowing that everyone is affected, and no one is immune, really adds to the sense of tension. The movie leaves you confused and afraid, not knowing if anything you are seeing is actually real... and it's remarkably effective.

Another special mention to Justin Welborn. I knew I'd seen that face before: He has been in both of the (excellent) Gregg Bishop movies that I have seen, Dance of the Dead and The Other Side. This guy must be having a good run with low-budget horror movies, so keep an eye out for him.

The gore, as I mentioned, is not as plentiful as it could have been, which helps keep the movie from degenerating into a total-bloodbath. That being said, there is plenty of blood being splashed around, people getting stabbed, etc., so gorehounds should be happy.

Perhaps the highlight of the movie, for me, was the second transmission, following Lewis. The middle of the movie contained some delightfully funny moments. Comic relief is provided in the form of Chad McKnight as Jim Parsons, a Quagmire-esque next door neighbour who shows up for a party, ready to have sex and totally unaware of the carnage being caused by the signal. He has a number of classic lines, like "When that ball drops, I'm gonna grab a slut and I'm just gonna pee in her butt!". The humour is totally dead-pan, and utterly hilarious. And then without a second to savor it you are thrust back into the insanity and carnage, which I found brilliant.

Overall, a film with tremendous punch for such a low budget, only being shot for $50,000. Definitely worth picking up, I would probably rate it more entertaining than Bug in the whole insanity/psychological horror department.
79
Vote
   


Movie Review: Sympathy

June 19th 2009 05:41


Premise: A bank robber abducts a girl and hides out in a motel, with the intent of driving to an airport in Canada the following day. During the night, the bank robber and the girl are both themselves taken hostage by an escaped convict. As events unfold in the motel room, we begin to learn about each of the characters, and discover that no-one is what they seem.

In a nutshell: This movie is really a gem of low-budget cinema. It should be used as a 'how-to' guide for shooting on a tight (read: 0) budget. Apparently (according to imdb), the last 20 minutes of the movie was shot with only the director and 3 cast members present, with the off-camera crew members operating the boom mics and camera.... and it was shot in an unheated barn with temperatures ranging from 100 - 0 degrees. And yet, the movie does not suffer from it at all, with the quality you would expect from a much higher budget offering.

Sympathy is not your typical horror movie. In fact, I wouldn't even describe it as a horror at all, more a psychological thriller. The film is set entirely in the one motel room, and as I said only contains the three cast members.

First up, the acting was above-average for a movie of this budget. With no effects or props to distract the audience, the emphasis is placed solely on the 3 characters, who each carry the movie in their own way. My personal favourite was Aaron Boucher, who did an excellent job of playing the psychopathic escaped convict. Steven Pritchard was probably the weakest of the three as the bumbling bank robber, but still put in a convincing performance.

The script itself is quite entertaining, and even though there are no set changes the audience remains engaged. I'm trying not to give too much away here, so I'll remain vague... As I mentioned previously, no one is what they seem, and the twists and turns the plot follows are quite unpredictable, so I was pleasantly surprised. The final twists that occur at the climax are probably the strongest point of the movie, with the last 5 mins or so being quite fantastic.

Overall, definitely worth a look. I'm calling it great horror, simply for achieving such results with such a low budget. Although it doesn't hold it's own against Alien or The Thing, and isn't really a horror, still a great movie and a shining example of low-budget film-making.

31
Vote
   


Movie Review: Bug

June 11th 2009 04:42


Premise: A woman named Agnes (Ashley Judd), is being stalked by her newly released from jail, abusive ex-husband, Jerry (Harry Connick Jr.). Meanwhile, a friend brings over a guy named Peter for her to meet (Michael Shannon), and the two hit it off. Turns out things aren't as simple as they seem, when it turns out that Peter is on the run from the army, who were performing experiments on him in a military hospital.

If I could pick one word to sum up this movie, it would be intense. It is a tale of the struggle between fear and sanity, and an exploration of how broken people can be driven over the brink.

First up, a shout out to the lead actors. Everyone put in an excellent performance, from the overpoweringly aggressive Jerry to the quiet psychosis conveyed by Peter, but hats off to Ashley Judd as the broken lead who falls deeper and deeper into insanity as the movie progresses.

As well as the acting, the movie's direction is great. It just oozes tension and menace, even from simple things. The line between reality and insanity is shaky in parts of the movie, and the direction emphasize this point well. Then again, I suppose you would expect nothing less from William Friedkin, who also directed The Exorcist.

Generally these 'insanity'-type movies are let down by a weak ending, and this has a sudden and disturbing ending, but I feel this was definitely the best way to end the movie. I don't want to give it away, but the sudden finality of it will definitely stick with you long after the credits have finished rolling.

I would definitely recommend this one for anyone looking for an intense psychological thriller. However, those of you interested in the more macabre (a.k.a. gorehounds) may want to avoid the subtle psychosis that Bug has to offer.
44
Vote
   


Moderated by Someone
Copyright © 2006 2007 2008 On Topic Media PTY LTD. All Rights Reserved. Design by Vimu.com.
On Topic Media ZPages: Sydney |  Melbourne |  Brisbane |  London |  Birmingham |  Leeds     [ Advertise ] [ Contact Us ] [ Privacy Policy ]