SomeoneMovie Review: Rise: Blood Hunter
June 14th 2009 09:32
Take 2:
Premise: A reporter (Lucy Liu) is converted by some vampires, and then seeks revenge. Nothing new to see here.
Some movies, while belonging to a genre, are simply so different that they stand apart because of their individuality. The uniqueness of it is interesting, and it is this effect that they are going for in Rise. The violent, lifestealing side of the vampires are given a back-seat, with the sensuality and depravity is thrust forward. The vampires don't have fangs: instead, they are portrayed as basically nymphos who like blood orgies.
Unfortunately, Rise completely misses the mark. Sure, trying to put a new spin on a cliched vampire movie might seem like a good idea, but for this to work you really need the camera-work and scripting to back it up. Genre-defying movies have to be good, and this one isn't.
First up: The story isn't shown chronologically. The movie begins somewhere about 3/4 of the way through the actual story, and then alternates between following the story from there and telling the beginning of the story. To be fair, when this technique is used, it can be remarkably effective. Anyone who doesn't agree... go watch Memento and get back to me. However, really this technique is only well implemented when coupled with a clever script, and here it isn't. When done right, it can confuse and disorient the audience. Well, I was confused and disoriented alright, but it wasn't intentional. It was solely due to the clumsy handling of the switch between timeframes. Sure, I caught on after a while, and I don't pick up on these things well, but the way they handled it still sucked.
Moving on: Lucy Liu should not be given leading roles. I don't know what it is about her, but by the end of the movie I wanted her to die. No, scratch that. I needed her to die. She just... I don't know exactly what it is... but she annoys the crap out of me. If anyone else has seen this, please tell me if it's just me.
In fact, most of the acting in this movie is pretty rotten. About the only saving grace is James D'Arcy, who plays a pretty convincing vampire villain. Other than him... no one worth mentioning.
One thing that irked me though was how this movie tried (and failed) so hard to be a hip new vamp movie. Like I mentioned, the vamps don't have fangs. They also seem to have had the vampire-powers things completely toned down, to the point that they are barely vamps. In fact, it's possible that they aren't. They don't actually say the word 'vampire', and they seem to get their kicks out of necrophilia as well as blood-sucking. However, it's pretty obvious that they've vampires, and the goal of being a unique vamp movie falls short as a lame attempt to do something different, and failing.
Oh, and another thing. A movie with 'blood' in the title, you expect a lot of blood, right? Well, there's alot of blood... and that's about it. Basically the highlight for a gorehound will be seeing Lucy Liu with blood all down her front, a blood-smeared car window, or blood spattered walls. No gore, no vampires tearing people apart, no stakes, no vamps dissolving in sunlight, nothing! In fact, the closest we come to a juicy vampire bite is seeing Lucy Liu smother a guy with a pillow and then bit his arm and suck blood out of that... and even that isn't totally convincing.
About the best thing this film has going for it is nudity. There are naked breasts all over the place. In fact, it's actually ludicrous as to the amount of boob-watching that goes on, and I got a kick out of seeing how quickly they could introduce girls and get them naked. It never really goes into exploitation territory, as the nudity always has a place, but still... that much breast is no coincidence.
So in short... avoid this one, unless you are looking for an excuse to make your conservative partner watch some softcore porn.
Premise: A reporter (Lucy Liu) is converted by some vampires, and then seeks revenge. Nothing new to see here.
Some movies, while belonging to a genre, are simply so different that they stand apart because of their individuality. The uniqueness of it is interesting, and it is this effect that they are going for in Rise. The violent, lifestealing side of the vampires are given a back-seat, with the sensuality and depravity is thrust forward. The vampires don't have fangs: instead, they are portrayed as basically nymphos who like blood orgies.
Unfortunately, Rise completely misses the mark. Sure, trying to put a new spin on a cliched vampire movie might seem like a good idea, but for this to work you really need the camera-work and scripting to back it up. Genre-defying movies have to be good, and this one isn't.
First up: The story isn't shown chronologically. The movie begins somewhere about 3/4 of the way through the actual story, and then alternates between following the story from there and telling the beginning of the story. To be fair, when this technique is used, it can be remarkably effective. Anyone who doesn't agree... go watch Memento and get back to me. However, really this technique is only well implemented when coupled with a clever script, and here it isn't. When done right, it can confuse and disorient the audience. Well, I was confused and disoriented alright, but it wasn't intentional. It was solely due to the clumsy handling of the switch between timeframes. Sure, I caught on after a while, and I don't pick up on these things well, but the way they handled it still sucked.
Moving on: Lucy Liu should not be given leading roles. I don't know what it is about her, but by the end of the movie I wanted her to die. No, scratch that. I needed her to die. She just... I don't know exactly what it is... but she annoys the crap out of me. If anyone else has seen this, please tell me if it's just me.
In fact, most of the acting in this movie is pretty rotten. About the only saving grace is James D'Arcy, who plays a pretty convincing vampire villain. Other than him... no one worth mentioning.
One thing that irked me though was how this movie tried (and failed) so hard to be a hip new vamp movie. Like I mentioned, the vamps don't have fangs. They also seem to have had the vampire-powers things completely toned down, to the point that they are barely vamps. In fact, it's possible that they aren't. They don't actually say the word 'vampire', and they seem to get their kicks out of necrophilia as well as blood-sucking. However, it's pretty obvious that they've vampires, and the goal of being a unique vamp movie falls short as a lame attempt to do something different, and failing.
Oh, and another thing. A movie with 'blood' in the title, you expect a lot of blood, right? Well, there's alot of blood... and that's about it. Basically the highlight for a gorehound will be seeing Lucy Liu with blood all down her front, a blood-smeared car window, or blood spattered walls. No gore, no vampires tearing people apart, no stakes, no vamps dissolving in sunlight, nothing! In fact, the closest we come to a juicy vampire bite is seeing Lucy Liu smother a guy with a pillow and then bit his arm and suck blood out of that... and even that isn't totally convincing.
Mmm... Breasts.
So in short... avoid this one, unless you are looking for an excuse to make your conservative partner watch some softcore porn.
| 20 |
| Vote |
Subscribe to this blog
